乐闻世界logo
搜索文章和话题

Why use redux observable over redux saga?

2个答案

1
2

When selecting middleware for a state management library, both Redux-Observable and Redux-Saga are powerful options with distinct advantages. Reasons for choosing Redux-Observable may include the following:

Reactive Programming with RxJS

Redux-Observable is built on RxJS, a reactive programming library that enables handling asynchronous events and stream-based programming using Observables. If the team is already familiar with reactive programming paradigms or if RxJS is already in use within the project, adopting Redux-Observable is beneficial as it leverages existing knowledge and codebase.

Example: Consider a complex application handling multiple data streams, such as real-time stock price updates, user interactions, and network requests. Using RxJS, we can create a unified stream to process this information and easily merge, filter, and transform these streams with various operators.

Rich Set of Operators

RxJS provides a powerful set of operators that enhances flexibility and robustness when handling asynchronous operations in complex scenarios. For instance, operators like debounceTime, throttleTime, switchMap, mergeMap, and concatMap can be used for debouncing, throttling, and canceling previous requests.

Example: Consider an autocomplete input box where we want to trigger an API call to display suggestions upon user input, but not on every keystroke—instead, after the input stabilizes. The debounceTime operator achieves this by waiting for a period of inactivity before executing the API call.

Tighter Integration

Redux-Observable allows developers to integrate action creators, asynchronous streams, and the Redux store more seamlessly. This enables Epics (functions for handling asynchronous operations) to access the current store state and dispatch multiple actions without interfering with UI components.

Example: Consider a scenario where user behaviors trigger multiple actions, such as fetching personal information and loading preferences after a successful login. In Redux-Observable, we can listen for the login success action within an Epic and use a chain of RxJS operators to manage this complex flow.

Stream Control and Error Handling

In RxJS, stream concepts and error handling are first-class citizens, allowing developers to manage stream lifecycles and errors declaratively. This approach may be more convenient than using Generator functions in Redux-Saga for certain use cases.

Example: Imagine handling network requests where retries are needed on failure. RxJS provides operators like retry or retryWhen, which simplify implementing this logic.

Summary

The choice of Redux-Observable typically depends on the team's preference for reactive programming and their familiarity with RxJS. If developers are accustomed to using RxJS and wish to leverage its capabilities for complex asynchronous or stream-based scenarios, Redux-Observable is a suitable choice. Conversely, if the team prefers traditional JavaScript and asynchronous handling approaches, Redux-Saga may better align with their habits.

2024年6月29日 12:07 回复

Redux-Observable 是一个令人惊叹的库,我们在生产中使用它 1.5 年了,到目前为止没有任何问题,它完全可测试,并且可以轻松与任何框架集成。我们的并行套接字通道超载,唯一能避免冻结的就是 Redux-Observable

在这里我想提三点。

1. 复杂性和学习曲线

Redux-saga 在这里轻松击败了 redux-observable。如果你只需要一个简单的请求来完成授权,并且由于某些原因你不想使用 redux-thunk,你应该考虑使用 redux-saga,它更容易理解。

如果您事先没有 Observable 的知识,这对您来说会很痛苦,您的团队将为您提供指导:)

2. Observable 和 RxJS 能为我提供什么?

当谈到异步逻辑时,Observable 就是你的瑞士刀,Observable 几乎可以为你做所有事情。你永远不应该将它们与承诺或发电机进行比较,它的功能要强大得多,就像将擎天柱与雪佛兰进行比较一样。

那么 RxJS 呢?它就像 lodash.js,但对于异步逻辑,一旦你进入,你将永远不会切换到不同的东西。

3. 反应式扩展

只需检查此链接

http://reactivex.io/languages.html

反应式扩展适用于所有现代编程语言,它只是函数式编程的关键。

因此,明智地花时间学习 RxJS 并使用 redux-observable :)

2024年6月29日 12:07 回复

你的答案